dykealectics:

allonoodle:

personally identifying as pansexual is all fine and cool and valid but when, in ur explanation of pansexuality u use the phrases “HEARTS not PARTS” or “I look at PERSONALITY not what’s in their PANTS” or when, ppl ask how it’s different from bisexuality u say “it includes trans + nb ppl” then im sorry 2 break it 2 u but ur both biphobic aaaaaand transphobic

and homophobic too!


  1. taylourrry reblogged this from critdanshi
  2. elemmirekirk5031 reblogged this from bossykiwi
  3. hvnnyletters reblogged this from system-splintered
  4. marshianm reblogged this from meaningtotellyou
  5. whatislifebro reblogged this from spacekin-
  6. nose-bl reblogged this from deanwinchesterisadorable and added:
    once i commented on a post about bi/pansexuality that some people preferred the label “pan”, that they fit in that box,...
  7. nose-bl said: Sorry, i don’t understand, did OP say that bisexuality not always include trans people? Like, saying trans is a third gender? If op implied that, well that’s wrong, but maybe i just didn’t understand
  8. deanwinchesterisadorable reblogged this from kaylabliss
  9. philthepegacorn reblogged this from rosylina
  10. ted-like-the-talk said: Don’t forget enbyphobic
  11. robotrightsactivist reblogged this from critdanshi
  12. oaklyndaily said: What is the difference between bisexuality and pansexuality? Seriously asking because that rhetoric taught me the difference, but since that’s not true, what is the difference so I can better defend both in any argument?
  13. whitetiger94things reblogged this from somecunttookmyurl
  14. critdanshi posted this
SML